Brand
Name |
Manufacturers reply to test report |
Our reply after retests or otherwise |
| DMS |
“The test records maintained in laboratory show that milk containing 6.05% Fat and 9.1% SNF was only packed by. The huge variation in the actual analysis of full cream milk in the poly pack as reported by laboratory and the results reported by you depicts the faulty sampling & testing at your level” |
The retest result of Fat is lower than the min. reqd. limit but we will consider the earlier reported. For SNF we have now found is 8.51 % by mass.
About total plate count as found is on similar line as reported earlier. |
| VITA |
“Fat percentage in the milk dispatched was 6.1% as against 6.8% conveyed by you similarly, SNF percentage was 9.1% as against 7.69% got tested by you.
Total plate count is stated to be 1, 600, 00, 000 cfu/ml. which is not consistent with 3 hrs. methylene blue reduction time.” |
The retest results are
Fat – 6.0
Milk solid not fat (SNF ) – 9.06
The retest results of new batch of sample are on quite lower side against earlier reported |
| AMUL |
“ our milk cell at the batch bearing code no MS/10/06/11/6A has the following test results
Fat % 6.1%
SNF % 9.14 %
Acidity 0.128% (Lactic acid)
MBRT 6.30 hr
from where you have purchased the milk to enable us to investigate”. |
The retest result of fat is slightly lower than you reported (i.e. 6.1%) but we will consider sent originally.
Milk solid not fat (SNF) - 8.85
The results of microbiological parameters is on the similar line as reported earlier. Milk purchased from Jangpura & Nizamuddin markets |
| VERKA |
“It is observed that many microbiological parameters deviated from norms. These are mainly for absence of complete cold chain till pouches reach to consumers. |
The retest result of Total Plate Count under microbiological parameters is on the similar line as reported earlier. |
| RELIANCE |
“The chemical analysis carried by NABL Lab indicating very high fat % i.e. 7.4 and SNF is 6.61 against 6.1 and 9.1 SNF given by us. i) At what temp. The product was stored and analyzed after its purchase. ii) How the product was handled after its purchase. iii) Cold chain, sampling method and handling of product after it purchase is very important for the product. |
The retest results are
Fat – 5.84
Milk solid not fat (SNF ) – 9.0
The result of Total Plate Count under microbiological parameters is on the similar line as reported earlier. ii) & iii) Answer in the general details above this table. |
| SANCHI |
The test results of our lab is entirely different and does not match the with your testing I.e. Total plate count – 7000 / ml & Coliform counts - Nil |
The test results as mentioned in your letter are of sample drawn from plant, however we have purchased the samples from retailer. |
| SARAS |
The above mentioned Batch of milk was tested in our Lab and as per our QC reports :-
SPC count – 4000 / ml
Coliform count – Nil/ml |
The retest results of new batch of sample are total plate count - 69000 cfu/ml and coliform count 100 cfu/ml. |